| Hypothesis | Evidence (F values) | |
| 1 | There is no interaction between reading comprehension test performance and text organization. | 4.846** (df = 3, 731) | 
| 2 | There is no interaction between reading comprehension test performance and response format. | 10.395** (df = 2, 732) | 
| 3 | There is no interaction between reading comprehension test performance, text organization, and response format. | 6.149** (df = 6, 723) | 
| ** p < .005 (N=735) | ||
| Hypothesis | Evidence (F values) | |||
| 4 | There is no interaction between reading comprehension test performance, text organization, and the students' proficiency level. | Low n.s. (df = 3, 235) | Middle 3.82* (df = 3, 234) | High 8.87** (df = 3, 254) | 
| 5 | There is no interaction between reading comprehension test performance, response format, and the students' proficiency level. | Low n.s. (df = 2, 236) | Middle 8.57** (df = 2, 235) | High 14.28** (df = 2, 255) | 
| 6 | There is no interaction between reading comprehension test performance, text organization, response format, and the students' proficiency level. | Low 2.63* (df = 6, 227) | Middle 3.06* (df = 6, 226) | High 6.61** (df = 6, 246) | 
| * p < .05, ** p < .005 (N=735) | ||||
| Main Article | Appendix 1 | Appendix 2 | 
 Author Index
	Author Index Page Index
	Page Index Title Index
	Title Index Main Index
	Main Index