Hypothesis | Evidence (F values) |
|
1 | There is no interaction between reading comprehension test performance and text organization. | 4.846** (df = 3, 731) |
2 | There is no interaction between reading comprehension test performance and response format. | 10.395** (df = 2, 732) |
3 | There is no interaction between reading comprehension test performance, text organization, and response format. | 6.149** (df = 6, 723) |
** p < .005 (N=735) |
Hypothesis | Evidence (F values) |
|||
4 | There is no interaction between reading comprehension test performance, text organization, and the students' proficiency level. | Low n.s. (df = 3, 235) |
Middle 3.82* (df = 3, 234) |
High 8.87** (df = 3, 254) |
5 | There is no interaction between reading comprehension test performance, response format, and the students' proficiency level. | Low n.s. (df = 2, 236) |
Middle 8.57** (df = 2, 235) |
High 14.28** (df = 2, 255) |
6 | There is no interaction between reading comprehension test performance, text organization, response format, and the students' proficiency level. | Low 2.63* (df = 6, 227) |
Middle 3.06* (df = 6, 226) |
High 6.61** (df = 6, 246) |
* p < .05, ** p < .005 (N=735) |
Main Article | Appendix 1 | Appendix 2 |